Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins

Good Law
715 F.3d 1127·2013 WL 1607706·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7565
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 201312-56734California9,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wardlaw, J.

Alejandro Rodriguez, Abdirizak Aden Farah, Jose Farias Cornejo, Yussuf Abdi-kadir, and Abel Perez Ruelas (“Appellees”) are the named plaintiffs representing a certified class of non-citizens who challenge their prolonged detention, pursuant to certain federal immigration statutes, without individualized bond hearings and determinations to justify their continued detention. The district court entered a preliminary injunction requiring the government to identify all class members de- tamed pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1226 (c) and 1225(b) (the “1226(c) subclass” and “1225(b) subclass,” respectively), and to “provide each of them with a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge with power to grant their release.” Under the preliminary injunction, at the conclusion of each bond hearing, the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) “shall release each Subclass member on reasonable conditions of supervision, including electronic monitoring if necessary, unless the government shows by clear and convincing evidence that continued detention is justified based on his or her danger to the community or risk of flight.” The government appeals that order, and we affirm. . .

I.

At any given time, thousands…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.