Zhang

Zhang v. Sugars CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 17, 2013B243152California1,475 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

The order granting the anti-SLAPP motions was filed on November 4, 2011. On May 2, 2012, defendant-attorney Steven L. Sugars filed and served plaintiff by mail with a memorandum of costs. On or about the same day, Sugars also filed and served plaintiff by mail with a motion for attorney fees. On or about May 8, 2012, defendant-attorney Paul P. Cheng filed and served plaintiff by mail with a motion for attorney fees and costs. For her part, on or about May 21, 2012, plaintiff filed and served defendants by mail with a motion to strike and tax costs; the motion was directed at Sugars’s memorandum of costs. On or about May 25, 2012, plaintiff filed and served defendants by mail with an opposition to Cheng’s motion for attorney fees. On or about June 1, 2012, she filed and served defendants with an opposition to Sugars’s motion for attorney fees. In the foregoing paragraph, we say “on or about” because the record does not include the proofs of service for the pertinent documents with the exception of Sugars’s memorandum of costs. In the absence of the proofs of service, we have relied on other information—such as the dates on which the documents were signed or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.