P.

P. v. James CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 17, 2013D062415California2,438 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/17/13 P. v. James CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D062415

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. CE318583)

KENT JAMES,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Lantz

Lewis, Judge. Affirmed.

A jury found Kent James guilty of three counts each of burglary (counts 1, 3 & 5)

and petty theft with a prior (counts 2, 4 & 6) related to three separate shoplifting incidents

that occurred in early February 2012. James later admitted various enhancement

allegations related to earlier crimes. James appeals, claiming the evidence did not

support his convictions on counts 1 and 2 in connection with the first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.