P.

P. v. Hood CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 17, 2013D061078California2,154 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Courtney Jean Hood1 pleaded no contest to three counts of using personal

identifying information of another (Pen. Code,2 § 530.5, subd. (a)) and one count each of

burglary (§ 459), grand theft (§ 484g, subd. (a)), acquiring access cards of four or more

Although official court documents list appellant's last name as "Hoop," the trial court determined her true last name was "Hood."

Further statutory references are also to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated. people (§ 484e, subd. (b)), possessing forged items (§ 475, subd. (a)), possessing

completed paper (§ 475, subd. (c)), and receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)). The

trial court suspended imposition of sentence and granted Hood probation, conditioned

upon her serving 365 days in custody.

Hood appeals, contending we must reverse her conviction and allow her to

withdraw her guilty plea because the trial court erroneously denied her pretrial motion to

suppress the evidence against her. She additionally requests we independently review the

the transcript of an in camera proceeding conducted by the trial court under Pitchess v.

Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess)3 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.