P.
P. v. Baulknight CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Haller, J.
DISCUSSION
Baulknight contends the court erred in calculating his custody credits based on the
prior version of section 4019, rather than on the newer version of the statute that became
operative on October 1, 2011, while he was awaiting sentencing.
Under section 4019, defendants are entitled to earn credit towards their sentences
by performing additional labor (§ 4019, subd. (b)) and for good behavior (§ 4019, subd.
(c)). These credits are referred to as conduct credits. (People v. Duff (2010) 50 Cal.4th
787, 793.)
2 The Legislature has repeatedly amended section 4019 regarding the proper
calculation of conduct credits. When Baulknight committed his offense in June 2011,
individuals who had been convicted of a serious or violent felony were entitled to two
days of conduct credits for every four days actually served. (See Former § 4019, subd.
(f); Stats. 2010, ch. 426, § 2; former § 2933, subd. (e)(1); see People v. Rajanayagam
(2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 42, 48-49 (Rajanayagam).) However, when Baulknight was in
local custody awaiting sentencing, the Legislature amended section 4019 as part of the