Nikolic

Nikolic v. Forte CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 17, 2013B240453California5,830 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/17/13 Nikolic v. Forte CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ZVONIMIR NIKOLIC, B240453

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VC059700) v.

MARTIN FORTE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Margaret M. Bernal, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Timothy L. McCandless and Timothy L. McCandless for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lane J. Thomas for Defendants and Respondents.

****** After his residence was sold at a non-judicial foreclosure sale, plaintiff and appellant Zvonimir Nikolic filed a complaint alleging multiple causes of action against defendants and respondents Martin Forte; Nonine Freitas and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.