P.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. He presented no argument for reversal, but asked this court to review

the record for error as mandated Wende. Under Anders, he listed as possible but not

arguable issues, whether trial court abused its discretion in denying his: (1) statutory

motion to vacate his no contest plea because the trial court failed to advise him of the

immigration consequences as required by section 1016.5; and (2) non-statutory motion to

vacate his no contest plea because trial counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him of

3 the immigration consequences. We granted Carrillo permission to file a brief on his own

behalf. He has not responded.

Our review of the record pursuant to Wende, including the possible issues listed by

counsel pursuant to Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable issues on appeal.

Competent counsel has represented Carrillo on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order is affirmed.

McINTYRE, J.

WE CONCUR:

NARES, Acting P. J.

AARON, J.

4