Svaco
Svaco v. Fusina CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Aaron, J.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Joseph Fusina purchased a five-acre parcel of undeveloped land (the Fusina Parcel
or Fusina's Parcel) from Eveline Bustillos (Eveline). At the time of the sale, Eveline also
owned a separate parcel (the Eveline Parcel or Eveline's Parcel) located in the same
general vicinity as the Fusina Parcel. Around the time of the sale of the Fusina Parcel,
Eveline transferred Eveline's Parcel to a trust, of which Esther Keefe Svaco is the trustee,
and Eveline and others are beneficiaries. Neither Fusina's Parcel nor Eveline's Parcel is
adjacent to a public road. Access to Fusina's Parcel and Eveline's Parcel is gained by way
of a private access road (Access Road) that traverses several parcels,1 including Eveline's
Parcel and Fusina's Parcel. The Access Road reaches Eveline's Parcel first, then splits
and continues on to Fusina's Parcel.
Svaco filed this lawsuit in which she contended that a provision in the covenants,
conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) governing Fusina's Parcel and Eveline's Parcel
required Fusina to contribute one-third of the costs related to improvements to the Access