Mkrtchyan

Mkrtchyan v. Connect to Communications CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 2013B244224California405 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 4/18/13 Mkrtchyan v. Connect to Communications CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ARAM MKRTCHYAN, B244224

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC436000) v.

CONNECT TO COMMUNICATIONS,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ernest M. Hiroshige, Judge. Dismissed. Aram Mkrtchyan, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent. —————————— Aram Mkrtchyan filed an action alleging fraud against Connect to Communications. On July 24, 2012, the trial court sustained Connect to Communication’s demurrer with leave to amend within 10 days. The court stated that the complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.