Friebel

Friebel v. Bosenko CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 2013C071138California946 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Friebel filed a petition for a temporary restraining order and injunction to prevent Bosenko from harassing her. Asked in the petition to describe how Bosenko harassed

1 her, Friebel wrote: “Sheriff Tom Bosenko seem [sic] to behave with high confident misconduct that is the purpose of my restraining order. He persuades important officials my insurance settlement is his. Murder is said to be involved: please check Mormon contacts of Bosenko/Robinson.” At other times, Friebel averred, “[f]rom the date I attended a seminar How to Collect missing money that Belongs to a victim, a strong violent attack[,] hundreds of attacks[.] Bosenko’s kin call his ‘surge’: pressure, lying about me: I have been advise and I [illegible], on things native American Indians do not use, and much more to attack my reputation.” The trial court denied Friebel’s request for a temporary restraining order. No response from Bosenko appears in the record. The trial court conducted an unreported hearing on Friebel’s petition. According to the minute order of those proceedings, Friebel appeared, testified, and requested that “the Court rescind a levy on her personal property and funds.” The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.