Gotti

Gotti v. Pinnock CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 2013D061802California1,585 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Filed 4/19/13 Gotti v. Pinnock CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

NONI GOTTI, D061802

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00104874-

CU-FR-CTL)

THEODORE A. PINNOCK,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald S.

Prager, Judge. Affirmed.

Defendant Theodore A. Pinnock, a now-disbarred attorney residing in the

Philippines, filed over 200 cases on behalf of plaintiff Noni Gotti against businesses for

alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), allegedly without her

knowledge and consent and for disabilities from which she did not suffer. Gotti thereafter filed this action against Pinnock,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.