Richart

Richart v. Miracosta Community College Dist. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2013D061865California5,284 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/22/13 Richart v. Miracosta Community College Dist. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

VICTORIA MUNOZ RICHART, D061865

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00083862-

CU-OE-CTL)

MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

DISTRICT,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jacqueline

M. Stern, Judge. Affirmed.

In this anti-SLAPP case, we largely agree with the trial court that plaintiff and

respondent Victoria Munoz Richart's complaint against defendant and appellant

MiraCosta Community College District (District) is not subject to a motion to strike

under the anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure1 section 425.16. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.