Rodriguez Victor v. Holder

Good Law
515 F. App'x 699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 201307-73520California284 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jose Manuel Rodriguez Victor and Aide Osegueda Gutierrez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider the BIA’s prior order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.2005). We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings. Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA was within its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior decision affirming the IJ’s denial of cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(C); see also Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 889 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[cjancellation of removal ... is based on statutory predicates that must first be met”).

We reject petitioners’ contention that their equal protection and due process rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.