Noe Pineda De Leon v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
516 F. App'x 622
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 201310-72343California161 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Noe Pineda De Leon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NA-CARA”) and for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Pineda De Leon is not eligible for special rule cancellation of removal under NACARA Section 203. See Lanuza v. Holder, 597 F.3d 970, 972 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam).

We also lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Pineda De Leon failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.