Carlos Aldana-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 201309-74103California382 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS ALDANA-HERNANDEZ, No. 09-74103

Petitioner, Agency No. A057-437-139

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 16, 2013 **

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Aldana-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, Retuta v. Holder, 591 F.3d

1181, 1184 (9th Cir. 2010), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA correctly concluded that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.