Hellwig

Hellwig v. Hammer CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2013B235124California801 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

BACKGROUND

On March 9, 2011, the superior court granted a restraining order against appellant Herbert B. Hammer, including personal conduct orders, stay-away orders, and a no-gun order. The personal conduct orders restrain Mr. Hammer for three years from physically or financially abusing, intimidating, molesting, attacking, assaulting (sexually or otherwise), hitting, following, stalking, threatening, harassing, destroying personal property, keeping under surveillance, or blocking movements of Kathleen T. Ketcham. The stay-away orders require Mr. Hammer to stay at least 100 yards from Ms. Ketcham and her vehicle. The no-gun order prohibits Mr. Hammer’s ownership or possession of a firearm.

APPEALABILITY OF THE RESTRAINING ORDER

Mr. Hammer filed his notice of appeal from the order, and his designation of the record on appeal, on August 5, 2011. The notice of appeal identifies the order from which the appeal is taken as an “order after judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1(a)(2),” entered March 9, 2011. However, only one order or judgment is

The restraining order purports to be signed by Marion Johnson, Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, and the minute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.