P.

P. v. Rogers CA1/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2013A132660California3,012 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rivera, J.

Filed 4/22/13 P. v. Rogers CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A132660

v. SANTONIO DESHWAN ROGERS, (Solano County Super. Ct. No. VCR208349) Defendant and Appellant.

Santonio Deshwan Rogers appeals from a judgment upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code,1 496, subd. (a)) and first degree residential burglary (§ 459). He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant was charged with receiving stolen property, five counts of second degree robbery with an enhancement for personal use of a firearm, and one count of first degree residential burglary. Prior to trial, defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.