Milette

Milette v. Vaughns CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2013A134468California3,691 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/22/13 Milette v. Vaughns CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

DONNA MILETTE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A134468

v. (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. MSC0901034 THOMAS VAUGHNS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents. ______________________________________/

Donna Milette sued Thomas and Charlotte Vaughns (collectively, the Vaughns) for, among other things, breach of written and oral contract arising out of the Vaughns‟ purchase of an interest in Milette‟s property. The parties settled the case during trial. The trial court denied Milette‟s motion for $116,275 in attorney fees, concluding there was “no contractual or statutory ground for recovery shown by the evidence nor did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.