John Entler v. L. Young

MEMORANDUM

Washington state prisoner John Thomas Entler appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2). Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Entler’s action challenging the prison’s grievance procedures because “[t]here is no legitimate claim of entitlement to a prison grievance procedure.” Mann v. Adams, 855 F.2d 639, 640 (9th Cir.1988).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3. Accordingly, Entler's request for publication is denied.