Robin Petersen v. Boeing Company

Good Law
715 F.3d 276·2013 WL 1776975·35 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 817·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 201311-18075California3,161 words

Opinion

Opinion

I

Plaintiff Robin P. Petersen, who appears pro se and informa pauperis on appeal, is a former Navy pilot with the rank of Commander who was recruited to work in Saudi Arabia as a flight instructor for Boeing International Support Services (“BISS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Boeing Corporation (“Boeing”). Except as otherwise indicated, the following account describes the facts as alleged in the Complaint.

Prior to departing for Saudi Arabia, Petersen was required to sign a preliminary employment agreement. That agreement did not contain a forum selection clause. On arrival in Saudi Arabia, however, he was forced to sign a second employment agreement — which he was not given time to read and which he was told he must sign or else return immediately to the United States at his own expense. This agreement contained a forum selection clause requiring any contractual disputes to be resolved in the Labor Courts of Saudi Arabia. Petersen signed the second agreement without reading it, as he was instructed to do by his employer.

Petersen’s passport was then confiscated; he was effectively imprisoned in his housing compound under miserable living conditions; and his work…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.