Cambridge

Cambridge v. Holland CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2013E053672California2,388 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/26/13 Cambridge v. Holland CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RICHARD CAMBRIDGE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E053672

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVVS1000888)

MILTON HOLLAND, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Steve Malone,

Judge. Affirmed.

Kevin McBride for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Charles D. Nachand, Charles D. Nachand and Richard B. Hudson

for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant Milton Holland appeals from an order denying his special

motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (hereinafter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.