P.

P. v. Collado CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 2013A135247California3,189 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/25/13 P. v. Collado CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A135247

v. FERNANDO A. COLLADO, (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 211410) Defendant and Appellant.

Fernando A. Collado (appellant) was convicted, following a jury trial, of two misdemeanor counts of violating a restraining order. On appeal, appellant contends the trial court erred and violated his constitutional rights when it refused to engage in de novo review of the validity of the restraining order on which his convictions were based. We shall affirm the judgment.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant was charged by information with one count of stalking (Pen. Code, § 646.9, subd. (a)—count one);1 one count of stalking in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.