P.
P. v. Brown CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Lee Derrick Brown alleges that his trial attorney was ineffective
because he failed to object to the imposition of a $10,000.00 restitution fine. We decline
to find counsel ineffective, but will remand the matter to afford the trial court the
opportunity to exercise its discretion regarding the amount of the fine.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant is a 32-year-old mentally disabled man with a history of criminal
behavior. In February 2010, he was on parole and living in a non-operable van in a
vacant lot next to an apartment building in Desert Hot Springs where J.G. and her mother
A.C. lived in separate units. Sometimes A.C. gave defendant food; sometimes she
allowed him to go into J.G.’s apartment to wash his hands or take a shower; in the past
she had tried to help him get into a homeless shelter.
On February 21, 2010, while J.G. was away, A.C. let defendant into J.G.’s
apartment to wash up. That evening, after J.G. returned home, defendant, who appeared
to be “flirting” with her, gave her a “love letter” and became angry when she refused to
accept a drink from him or let him spend the night in her apartment. Defendant poured
half a…