Tunold
Tunold v. Meints CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2013E055725California6,928 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/26/13 Tunold v. Meints CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
GILLIAN TUNOLD,
Plaintiff and Appellant, E055725
v. (Super.Ct.No. INC10004568)
DEBORAH A. MEINTS, OPINION
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Randall Donald White,
Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Shadek Reese, Ltd., Susanna T. Kintz and John L. Shadek for Plaintiff and
Appellant.
Roemer & Harnik, Mary E. Gilstrap and Helene P. Dreyer Koch for Defendant
and Respondent.
On December 6, 2011, the trial court sustained the demurrer of defendant Deborah