Elson

Elson v. Gondrezick CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 23, 2022D079216California6,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Filed 11/23/22 Elson v. Gondrezick CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN N. ELSON, as Trustee, etc. et D079216 al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018- v. 00054190-CU-0R-CTL)

NATALIE N. GONDREZICK, as Trustee, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Gregory W. Pollack, Judge. Affirmed. Stallone Law Offices and David O. Stallone for Appellants. Law Offices of Edward W. Freedman and Edward W. Freedman for Respondents. Through their revocable trusts, John Elson and his son Joseph Elson (collectively, the Elsons) are the former and current owners of property bordering Natalie N. Gondrezick’s property.1 The Elsons sued Gondrezick to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.