United States v. United States District Court for Northern Mariana Islands

Good Law
694 F.3d 1051·12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 2012No. 11-72940California4,795 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Clifton, J.

The government has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting that this court vacate four district court orders directing the government to be represented at an initial court settlement conference by a representative with full authority to settle a civil tax refund lawsuit. We hold that the district court has the authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement conferences, but that the exercise of such authority is subject to review for abuse of discretion. Based on the facts of this case, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in ordering a government representative with full settlement authority to appear at an initial settlement conference. Accordingly, we grant mandamus relief and direct the district court to vacate the disputed orders.

I. Background

The current dispute arises in the context of a multi-million dollar tax refund case pending in the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands. Following dis-allowance by the Internal Revenue Service of certain deductions, real party in interest John K. Baldwin paid a federal income tax deficiency and then filed a lawsuit seeking *1054…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.