Morris

United States v. Morris

Good Law
97 F. App'x 759
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 2004No. 03-50177California233 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Brent Douglas Morris appeals from the district court order denying the appointment of retained counsel under the Criminal Justice Act nunc pro tunc to the commencement of trial. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Morris has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No supplemental pro se brief has been filed.

The district court’s order denying retained counsel’s appointment as CJA counsel is neither a final appealable order, nor an appealable collateral order under Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ; Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468 , 98 S.Ct. 2454 , 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978) (setting forth that the order must: (1) conclusively determine disputed question, (2) resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and (3) be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment in order to fall within collateral order exception).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.