Pereda

Pereda v. Atos Jiu Jitsu LLC

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 23, 2022B313718California5,092 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Facts

A. Plaintiff In 2017, Ramon Pereda (plaintiff) was 49 years old. He was a former competitive bodybuilder who was familiar with sports that involved grappling: He was a wrestling celebrity at his high school; he kickboxed; he knew judo; and he had nearly achieved a brown belt in Taekwondo.

2 B. Plaintiff joins a local jiu-jitsu studio In the summer of 2017, plaintiff decided he wanted to learn Brazilian jiu-jitsu. A subset of jiu-jitsu generally, Brazilian jiu- jitsu is a sport in which competitors spar with one another on a mat and, through various grappling-type maneuvers, attempt to get one another into a chokehold; the match ends when the competitor who ends up in a chokehold submits, typically by “tapping out.” As this description implies, “choking” is a “major” and “integral” part of Brazilian jiu-jitsu. Plaintiff’s neighbor told him about The Jiu Jitsu League (the League), which is a Brazilian jiu-jitsu studio where the neighbor was a part-time instructor. Plaintiff also visited a website for Atos Jiu Jitsu, LLC, which does business as Atos Jiu- Jitsu Association (Atos). Atos’s website listed its various “affiliates,” of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.