Diego-Barrera

United States v. Diego-Barrera

Good Law
180 F. App'x 649
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 2006No. 05-50541California556 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Marcos Diego-Barrera appeals the district court’s imposition of a 78-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . He contends that the government failed to meet its burden of establishing that either of his 1991 convictions under California Health and Safety Code §§ 11351 and 11352 qualified as a “drug trafficking offense” for the purpose of a sentencing enhancement under either 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) or USSG § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) (2004).

California Health and Safety Code § 11352 is over-inclusive under the categorical approach of Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 , 110 S.Ct. 2143 , 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). See United States v. Navidad-Marcos, 367 F.3d 903, 907-08 (9th Cir.2004); see also United States v. Kovac, 367 F.3d 1116, 1118-19 (9th Cir. 2004); United States v. Riverar-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc).

*651 California Health and Safety Code § 11351 is also over-inclusive because it criminalizes the “purchase” of a controlled substance, which arguably may be proven even though the defendant never actually or constructively possessed the substance. See Armstrong v. Superior Court, 217 Cal.App.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.