Romero-Vasquez

Romero-Vasquez v. Gonzales

Good Law
180 F. App'x 705
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 2006No. 04-76537California278 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Melvin Romero-Vasquez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *706 (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s order denying Romero-Vasquez’s motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion, Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Romero-Vasquez’s motion to reopen filed with the IJ was untimely. The court mailed the in absentia removal order to Romero-Vasquez’s last known address on October 15, 2002, and Romero-Vasquez did not file his motion to reopen until March 2, 2004. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C) (requiring a motion to reopen based on exceptional circumstances to be filed within 180 days after the removal order); Singh-Bhathal v. INS, 170 F.3d 943 , 946 (9th Cir.1999).

Romero-Vasquez contends that his former attorney failed to inform him of the order of removal. This tolling contention is unpersuasive because Romero-Vasquez was mailed a copy of the order of removal to his last known address, and in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.