Lopez-Flores

Lopez-Flores v. Gonzales

Good Law
181 F. App'x 662
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 2006No. 04-74509California254 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Victor Lopez-Flores, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and *663 protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), we deny the petition for review.

The agency based its adverse credibility determination on significant omissions from Lopez-Flores’s asylum application and direct testimony regarding the basis for his claims of persecution and torture in Peru. For example, Lopez-Flores testified at the conclusion of his hearing that he was kidnaped and held by guerrillas for three months, and that he had been pressured to attend several Shining Path meetings, at which he was threatened, but did not mention these incidents in his application or primary testimony. The agency also relied on Lopez-Flores’s admission that he told immigration officials that he had no fear of returning to Peru and wished to voluntarily return. The record does not compel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.