Zhuxing Chen v. Gonzales

Good Law
181 F. App'x 690
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 2006No. 04-72469California270 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Zhuxing Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination, Ge v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Where, as here, it is unclear whether the BIA conducted a de novo review, the court may also look to the IJ’s opinion as a guide to what lay behind the BIA’s conclusion. See Avetova-Elisseva v. INS, 213 F.3d 1192, 1197 (9th Cir.2000). Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility finding because the inconsistencies between Chen’s testimony and his medical records cast doubt on his identity and his injuries, and therefore goes to the heart of his asylum claim. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001).

Because Chen cannot meet the lower standard of eligibility for asylum, he has failed to show that he is entitled to withholding of removal. See Farah…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.