Reyes-Osorto

United States v. Reyes-Osorto

Good Law
184 F. App'x 628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 2006No. 05-30461California352 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Reyes-Osorto pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). The district court sentenced him to a period of 87 months’ imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Reyes-Osorto appeals the reasonableness of his sentence in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

The parties are familiar with the facts of the case. We need not repeat them here.

We review a post-Booker sentence for reasonableness even if the sentence is within the Guidelines range. United States v. Plouffe, 436 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir. 2006), amended by 445 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1075, 1079 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Reyes-Osorto argues the district court imposed a sentence that was “greater than necessary” to achieve the goals of sentencing in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). The sentencing judge made his decision “[pjursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3553 (a), and after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements.” In light of Reyes-Osorto’s criminal history and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.