Nedd

Nedd v. Chertoff

Good Law
185 F. App'x 595
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 2006No. 03-56362California348 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Steve Richard Nedd, a native and citizen of Trinidad and Tobago, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order finding him removable and denying him relief from deportation under Section 212(c) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (“INA”) due to his guilty-plea conviction of possessing cocaine for sale in violation of California Health and Safety Code § 11351.

In accordance with Alvarez-Barajas v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1050, 1053 (9th Cir. 2005), we construe Nedd’s habeas petition as if it were a timely-filed petition for review with this court. We deny the petition.

Nedd contends that the Immigration Judge violated his due process rights by retroactively applying the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”) to deny him relief under INA § 212(c).

It is undisputed that Nedd entered his guilty plea to the predicate offense *597 after the effective date of AEDPA, at a time when he was not eligible for § 212(c) relief. Thus, the denial of such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.