Kaur

MEMORANDUM ***

Satwinder Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the summary affirmance by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of the denial of her application for asylum, 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a), withholding of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (b)(3), and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), 23 I.L.M. 1027, 1028 (1984) (as implemented by 8 C.F.R. § 208.16 ). As this is a streamlined case, we review the decision of the immigration judge (IJ). Fajardo v. INS, 300 F.3d 1018 , 1019 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition in part and dismiss it in part.

We review the IJ’s decision to see if there is substantial evidence to support it. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We may reverse the IJ’s factual findings only if “a reasonable factfinder would be compelled to find the petitioner eligible for the relief sought.” Gomez-Saballos v. INS, 79 F.3d 912 , 914 (9th Cir.1996).

Kaur argues that the IJ erred in finding that her asylum application was time-barred. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(2)(B); see also 8 C.F.R. § 208.4 (a)(2). We dismiss this contention for lack jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(3); Hakeem v.…