Garcia

United States v. Garcia

Good Law
189 F. App'x 650
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 2006No. 05-30318California291 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Garcia appeals his sentencing following conviction for conspiracy and distribution of methamphetamine. He claims that the judge abused his discretion when he refused to grant a downward departure on account of Garcia’s advanced age. This departure is entirely discretionary and we cannot review it here. United States v. Smith, 330 F.3d 1209, 1212 (9th Cir.2003).

Garcia also claims he was entitled to a downward adjustment on account of his limited role in the drug deal. We may overturn the court’s denial of a sentencing reduction for defendant’s limited role in the crime only “where the refusal was a clearly erroneous decision.” United States *651 v. Awad, 871 F.3d 583, 591 (9th Cir.2004). To qualify for a departure for either a minor or minimal role, a defendant must be “substantially less culpable than the average participant.” United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual. § 3B1.2 cmt. n. 3(A) (2004). A “minimal participant” is a defendant who “plays a minimal role in concerted activity” and is less culpable because he lacks “knowledge or understanding of the scope and structure” of the criminal enterprise. Id. cmt. n. 4. A “minor participant” is one who is “less…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.