Cano-Ramirez

United States v. Cano-Ramirez

Good Law
190 F. App'x 557
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 2006No. 05-50158California495 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

We affirm the 60-month sentence the district court imposed on Roberto CanoRamirez after he pleaded guilty to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a). United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126,1130 (9th Cir.2006).

We review Cano-Ramirez’s ultimate sentence for reasonableness in light of the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 260-63 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

Cano-Ramirez’s 60-month sentence, which was below the guideline range, is reasonable. The judge considered the *558 § 3553(a) factors that should have received significant weight, did not give significant weight to improper or irrelevant § 3553(a) factors, and imposed a sentence well within the limited range of choice dictated by the facts of the case. See United States v. Zavala, 443 F.3d 1165, 1168-69 (9th Cir. 2006). Although the judge did not explicitly analyze each of the § 3553(a) factors, his discussion reflects many of them and establishes adequate consideration of the statutory factors. See United States v. Knows His…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.