Kilian

Kilian v. Equity Residential Properties Trust

Good Law
191 F. App'x 537
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 2006Nos. 04-16723, 04-17538California926 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Kari Kilian appeals from the judgment and award of attorney’s fees in her suit against Equity Residential Properties Trust and Equity Residential Properties Management Corporation (collectively “Equity”). 1 The facts are known to the parties and will not be repeated here.

I

Kilian first claims that the district court abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of three of her expert witnesses: Dr. Michael Gray, Dr. Kaye Kilburn, and David Rueckert. The district court, however, properly assessed “whether the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony [was] scientifically valid and ... whether that reasoning or methodology properly [could] be applied to the facts in issue.” Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 592-93 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

First, the district court had adequate justification for concluding that Dr. Gray’s testimony was not scientifically valid. Dr. Gray used various tests in forming his opinion that even Dr. Kilburn, another of Kilian’s experts, stated were useless in detecting exposure to mycotoxins. In addition, the district court heard testimony that Dr. Gray does not follow the scientific method and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.