Gonzalez-Edeza

United States v. Gonzalez-Edeza

Good Law
191 F. App'x 610
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 2006No. 05-10345California168 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jaime Gonzalez-Edeza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 21-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Gonzalez-Edeza has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.