Chinchilla-Barahona

United States v. Chinchilla-Barahona

Good Law
191 F. App'x 617
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 2006No. 05-10084California282 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ronald Chinchilla-Barahona appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .

Chinchilla-Barahona contends that his plea was rendered involuntary because the district court failed to inquire personally whether he would like to go forward with the plea agreement or reconsider in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), which was decided the same day as the date originally set for sentencing. We disagree. The record of the change of plea hearing supports a finding of voluntariness, and reflects that the guilty plea was entered in accordance with Rule 11; Chinchilla-Barahona does not argue otherwise. Sentencing was continued, which allowed Chinchilla-Barahona to discuss the impact of Booker with his counsel. During the sentencing hearing, when counsel stated that it was in Chinchilla-Barahona’s best interest to go forward with the application of the Guidelines and the plea agreement notwithstanding Booker , Chinchilla-Barahona was present, assisted by an interpreter, and did not object.

We therefore dismiss in light of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.