Martinez

United States v. Martinez

Good Law
192 F. App'x 626
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 2006No. 04-50027California326 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Samuel Martinez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and the 77-month sentence imposed for being an illegal alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Martinez has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Martinez has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has filed an answering brief.

We have reviewed the briefs and conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hemandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.