Vergara-Romano
United States v. Vergara-Romano
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Franco Vergara-Romano appeals from his 54-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea for three counts of unlawful entry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325 . Vergara-Romano contends that the district court erred by failing to properly consider the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553 , in violation of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), by improperly calculating his applicable Guidelines range, and by fading to state its reasoning before imposing a term of supervised release as mandated by 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (c). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
A district court’s imposition of a sentence is reviewed for reasonableness. See Booker, 543 U.S. at 261-62 , 125 S.Ct. 738 . While “the district court must have sufficiently considered the Guidelines as well as the other factors listed in § 3553(a),” Booker “does not necessitate a specific articulation of each factor separately, but rather a showing that the district court considered the statutorily-designated factors in imposing a sentence.” United States v. Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d 913, 918 (9th Cir.2006).