Manalo

Manalo v. Gonzales

Good Law
194 F. App'x 438
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 2006No. 05-73382California140 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Pilar Solimán Manalo, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

Manalo’s contention that the agency violated her due process rights by failing to consider all relevant hardship factors is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[tjraditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.