Campos-Franco

Campos-Franco v. Gonzales

Good Law
195 F. App'x 575
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 28, 2006Nos. 04-75210, 05-71162California283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sergio Alberto Campos-Franco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *576 (“BIA”) order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal, and the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that Campos-Franco failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003).

The evidence Campos-Franco presented with his motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as his application for cancellation of removal. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 602-03 (9th Cir.2006). We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the evidence would not alter its prior discretionary determination that he failed to establish the requisite hardship. See id. at 600 (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)® bars this court from reviewing the denial of a motion to reopen where “the only question presented is whether [the] new evidence altered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.