Ramirez-Valerio

United States v. Ramirez-Valerio

Good Law
195 F. App'x 631
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 2006No. 05-30529California299 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*632 MEMORANDUM **

Gildardo Ramirez-Valerio appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

Ramirez-Valerio’s contentions regarding Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), are foreclosed by Ninth Circuit case law. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062 , 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that the court continues to be bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in Almendarez-Torres); see also United States v. Velasquez-Reyes, 427 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir.2005) (rejecting contention that the government is required to plead prior convictions in the indictment and prove them to a jury unless the defendant admits the prior convictions); United States v. Ochoa-Gaytan, 265 F.3d 837, 845-46 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), carved out an exception for prior convictions that specifically preserved the holding of Almendarez-Torres ); United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1025 (9th Cir.2001) (rejecting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.