Anguiano

United States v. Anguiano

Good Law
195 F. App'x 666
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 2006No. 05-50032California263 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Saul Anguiano appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

Anguiano’s contention that the district court’s condition of supervised release requiring him to report to his probation officer within 72 hours of re-entry into the United States violates the Fifth Amendment is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d 767, 772-73 (9th Cir.2006).

Nonetheless, Anguiano raised a constitutional challenge to his sentence before the district court and therefore preserved the nonconstitutional error identified in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1092-1096 (9th Cir.2006). Because we conclude that the Government has not established that it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect Anguiano’s sentencing, we vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing under the advisory Guidelines.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.