Zuniga-Camarena

United States v. Zuniga-Camarena

Good Law
195 F. App'x 672
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 2006No. 05-10814California234 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Zuniga-Camarena appeals from the 13-month sentence imposed following *673 his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the sentence for reasonableness, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 260-64 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and we affirm.

Zuniga-Camarena contends that his sentence is unreasonable and that the district court failed to take into account all of the considerations set out to guide sentencing. His contention fails. To comply with the requirements of Booker , the district court must consider the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). See United States v. Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d 913, 918 (9th Cir.2006). However, this “does not necessitate a specific articulation of each factor separately, but rather a showing that the district court considered the statutorily-designated factors in imposing a sentence.” See Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d at 918 . Here, the district court properly considered the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and the § 3553(a) factors, specifically, promotion of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.