Rockefeller
Rockefeller v. Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division
197 F. App'x 612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 2006No. 06-35290California96 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
The motions for costs and sanctions are denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.