Elias

Elias v. Dominguez ex rel. Hemp

Good Law
197 F. App'x 633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 2006No. 06-35267California88 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

*634 All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.