Aguilar-Delgado

United States v. Aguilar-Delgado

Good Law
198 F. App'x 676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 2006No. 05-10285California226 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Celestino Aguilar-Delgado appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for reasonableness sentences imposed after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), see United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d 767, 769 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.

Aguilar-Delgado contends that his sentence was unreasonable because the district court failed to appropriately consider sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) that would have resulted in a more mitigated sentence. Our review of the record shows that the district court gave sufficient consideration to the sentencing goals and factors set forth in § 3553(a), and gave reasons why the specific sentence imposed was warranted in this case. See Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d at 771 (affirming sentence as reasonable where the record shows the district court considered the § 3553(a) factors and imposed a sentence that was sufficient but no greater than necessary to comply with § 3553(a)). Accordingly, the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.